specific method · filed under evaluation
End-to-end exploit development evaluation
Assessing whether a model can turn a vulnerability into a working end-to-end exploit.
Also called Exploit development (Tier 2).
- source
- 1
- model
- 1
- lab adopt it
- 1
- strongest
- used
How sources treat it
One count per evidence span, weakest treatment to strongest.
used 1
Documented in
Evidence
1 span quoted from the sources, strongest treatment first.
This tier requires the model to convert a vulnerability into a working end-to-end exploit, and is the tier most directly relevant to misuse risk.
usedevaluation onlyin Kimi K3 Tier 2 exploit development suite (36 tasks)Moonshot AI
Filed alongside
Other methods under evaluation.
Prompt-based output standardizationEvaluation without safety filtersRefusal-suppressed variants for capability estimationavg@kAlmost@1Behavior testing with stubs and edge casesDeadline-bounded rollout evaluationDiverse benchmark validation for quantizationDocumenting evaluation configurationEvaluation equivalence thresholdFixed MTP draft-token acceptance lengthFour-run mean pass@1Full trajectory releaseJoint validation protocolMean@5Model–harness co-designOfficial-release-source baseline restrictionPrompt engineering to elicit answersProtocolQA robustness validationRefusal behavior quantificationRollout-based auditingSample test and length-constraint filteringSandboxed GPU kernel optimization evaluationSingle-agent and multi-agent evaluation configurations